Talk:Raffinerie Tirlemontoise

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Links in the references, sources and external links sections are all broken. Term "seed magma" in the last sentence of the history section is not defined. The head paragraph lists four business units of the company: the article does not say what three of them do. Polysinger (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be renamed to 'Raffinerie Tirlemontoise', as this is the internationally accepted name of the company. If it was only active in Flanders, one could also opt for 'Tiense Suikerraffinaderij', but the company also has factories in the French speaking part of Belgium, so 'Raffinerie Tirlemontoise' seems better. Apart from the choice between French or Dutch, the current name Sugar refinery of Tienen is not correct. First of all because on its English language website, the company does not advertise itself as Sugar refinery of Tienen, but as Raffinerie Tirlemontoise. What is even worse, is that the title suggests that the page is about a sugar refinery in Tienen, but there is no such thing. Both the company Raffinerie Tirlemontoise and its owner Südzucker consistently refer to the sugar factories of the company and not a sugar refinery.Grieg2 (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 June 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) SilverLocust (talk) 08:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar refinery of Tienen → Raffinerie Tirlemontoise – The current name Sugar refinery of Tienen is not correct. First of all because on its English language website, the company does not advertise itself as Sugar refinery of Tienen, but as Raffinerie Tirlemontoise. What is even worse, is that the title suggests that the page is about a sugar refinery in Tienen, but there is no such thing. Both the company Raffinerie Tirlemontoise and its owner Südzucker consistently refer to the sugar factories of the company and not to a sugar refinery. Grieg2 (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Frostly (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 07:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. There is absolutely no need to translate the names of foreign companies unless they are commonly seen in translation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.