Talk:Richard Horton (editor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former Lancet editor accused of cover-up[edit]

Former Lancet editor accused of cover-up. The British Medical Journal has published a detailed account of the failure of The Lancet editor Richard Horton to properly investigate the complaint made by Brian Deer about Dr. Andrew Wakefield's now infamous 1998 article. [Deer B. "Secrets of the MMR scare: The Lancet's two days to bury bad news." BMJ 342:c7001, 2011] This is the third article in the BMJ series about Wakefield's misconduct. Casewatch has posted the transcripts from the General Medical Council's hearings that ended with the revocation of Wakefield's medical license.

Brangifer (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Duesberg quote[edit]

I deleted a scientifically obsolete quote from the Inventing the AIDS Virus article and want to post it in the Horton article. It is:

Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote in The New York Review of Books that "The central role of HIV in the development of immunodeficiency is, in my view, established by the force of epidemiological and laboratory evidence. On this key issue, Duesberg is, I believe, in error," but "Duesberg has predicted, correctly, that the virus alone is not enough to explain all aspects of the immunodeficiency process."[1][2]

I think it is encyclopedic here because Horton has apparently never renounced it. Operative67 (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "'The AIDS Heresy': An Exchange". New York Review of Books. August 8, 1996. Retrieved 2010-04-08.
  2. ^ "'The AIDS Heresy': Another Exchange". New York Review of Books. September 19, 1996. Retrieved 2010-04-08. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Richard Horton (editor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Macchiarini[edit]

No mention of Macchiarini's fraudulent and harmful trachea implants, and Horton's refusal to retract papers needs to be written about. https://retractionwatch.com/2018/07/06/the-final-verdict-lancet-retracts-two-papers-by-macchiarini/ Horton/Lancet declaring not guilty Macchiarini: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)00118-X/fulltext Lancet finally retarcting after public statements by Swedish authorities https://retractionwatch.com/2023/10/27/lancet-retracts-two-more-papers-by-convicted-surgeon-paolo-macchiarini/ 5.20.193.193 (talk) 18:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]