Talk:Ridgway's rail

A fact from Ridgway's rail appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 March 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the endangered subspecies California Clapper Rail, a chicken-sized bird that rarely flies, has chicks that can swim when they are just two hours old?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/March.

Wikipedia

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Birds Low‑importance

Ridgway's rail is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2021 and 25 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rflores02, Kelseymcivor, Pjfarr.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tasks[edit]

A little bit of cleanup needed here. Tasks I'd suggest as a priority are:

adopting Wikipedia standards for the bird's (and "Common" Clapper Rail's) English name
removing confusion over the bird's taxonomic status (it can't really be both a species and a subspecies of another species, as the lead says

SP-KP 18:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a "species", but an "endangered species". Unfortunately, endangered "species" need not be taxonomic species. There's really no otehr way to express it in the article,I'm afraid. Circeus 19:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is ... you just need to give it a bit more thought. How about, for example, "The California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) is a subspecies of the Clapper Rail. It has been classified as "endangered species" by XXX (the categorisation system used by XXX uses the term "endangered species" regardless of the taxonomic status of the form in question)" SP-KP 19:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More problems:

rails aren't shorebirds
the taxobox is confused - the species entry gives the subspecies name, but links to the species
the article now says that this subspecies is related to the Clapper Rail - it was better before.
the endangered species thing still isn't fixed - following the endangered species link takes you to a definition which states equivocally that an endangered species is a species - if this is not correct, we need to fix that page; if it is, we need to fix this one

SP-KP 20:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done to Anlace for fixing the first three of the second set of problems above - please could you put the cleanup tag back though, as none of the original problems are fixed. We also now have another new problem in that "Common clapper rail" - an undefined entity - appears in the first paragraph - what do we mean by that? SP-KP 20:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anlace - your latest edit doesn't help, in my opinion. Why the reluctance to discuss this at the talk page? SP-KP 20:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as far as i know this is the talk page :) there is now no reference to the "common clapper rail" and i think your other issues have been addressed. have you read the endangered species page recently. it's been edited and should meet your objection. if not, have at it and fix endangered species to your liking, regards Anlace 20:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is it equivocation to state that an endangered species is a species? Did you mean to use a different word, or is there a nuance I'm not picking up on? It's somewhat redundant, but I don't think we can easily get around that while maintaining accuracy. Or are you concerned that a subspecies may also be endangered? It is my understanding that an organism is an individual, not a population. This conversation probably belongs at Talk:Endangered species, but I don't know if you have that on watch. NickelShoe 21:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that should have been unequivocal. I agree that a conversation is needed at Talk:Endangered species about the usages of the term; however, thanks to the work of User:jimfbleak the problems I flagged with this page all now appear to be sorted out - well done Jim. SP-KP 19:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First assessment[edit]

this is a usable article and meets WP NPOV reqs; writing is good and coverage is satisfactory; could easily become a good article with more work on range and references. Importance is high because of the conservation status of this species. Cdcdoc 05:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've rerated as C as areas missing (description being one) and needs linline cites Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]