Talk:Royal Monmouthshire Royal Engineers

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

MonmouthpediA High‑importance

	This article is related to MonmouthpediA and to Monmouth – the World's first Wikipedia town. As of May 2012, we have 1,000 QRpedia codes displayed in the town. See what we are doing, See a bit of what we've done and help us!MonmouthpediAWikipedia:GLAM/MONTemplate:WikiProject MonmouthpediAMonmouthpediA-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Colours[edit]

Colours redirect to color, which is obviously not what the article is discussing. Should it point to Colours, standards and guidons instead? CapnZapp (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent update/rollback concerns[edit]

Regarding concerns over use of copyrighted material, whilst some of the updated material I added to the page is from, or bears a remarkable resemblance to, the Official Army page that is because we own that information also. As the Regimental Operations Support Warrant Officer for the R Mon RE (M) I am, at the behest of the CO, seeking to update/modernise our web presence in its totality. We updated that page through the Army webmaster some time back and have used variations on that (updated) text in a number of ways since.

My thinking is that as owners of the 'Intellectual Property' as it were then we are able to use it as we wish? Happy to be educated... --RMonREM (talk) 12:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good to see the antecedents of most of the Engineers here!! R Mon RE (M), or the Army, may have the copyright, but because of the way WP works, as I see some others have started to explain to you, you're editing as a random user, technically with no connection to the Army (I think people have started to quote WP:COI at you already). To reproduce HM Copyright material from the Army site onto Wikipedia you will have follow the procedures laid out at WP:DONATETEXT. That will keep both you and the official Army site material in the clear. I see you're already seeking help from others; don't hesitate to do so from me as well. Hope it's not too cold in Wales right now!! Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 10:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Monmouthshire Royal Engineers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922082458/http://www.win.tue.nl/~drenth/BritArmy/Lineage/RE/index.html to http://www.win.tue.nl/~drenth/BritArmy/Lineage/RE/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]