Talk:Saturn 3

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Big Bang Theory[edit]

In episode The Lizard-Spock Expansion (s02e08) of The Big Bang Theory Sheldon andRajesh have to decide to watch Saturn 3 or Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. As a compromise Leonard suggeste Babylon 5. (Trivia or Cultural Reference section?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.1.221 (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant, shouldn't be referred to at all. 88.109.26.20 (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "things added to the 1984 NBC broadcast" list[edit]

There are some grammatical errors in the list, but the main problem is that it lists a lot of different scenes in a paragraph (should probably be fixed into something where each example can be separate as well), and some of them would be very difficult and/or impossible to find using the plot description. The main example that comes to mind is the one about an extended sequence of Adam walking down the corridor.

Aside from that, there is also the problem of the next bullet point, which seems very similar. It claims that the same broadcast added "musical cues", but then calls them "scenes" in the next sentence. Not sure if both "sections" should be combined.

Sorry if the description of the issues with the extra scenes was vague, but there are a lot of them, and I think a lot of them have the same general issues (not clear what the scenes are about and where they are in the movie's plot) I described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nandor1 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saturn 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304044504/http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article2154795.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article2154795.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]