Talk:Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

kghantoush (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (The Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare http://www.theschwartzcenter.org/.)

This[edit]

This page is an outline. Soon it is going to be edited by members of the Schwartz Center organization. After that I'll look it over and make sure it is unbiased and Wikified as well as I can make it. After that I'd be *very* much obliged if a few people could take a look at it, top to bottom.

Huzzah!

Dak06 (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What would be most helpful is if you could use as many WP:Independent sources (like a newspaper article about the organization) as possible. That helps us know that the information is what the world at large thinks about the organization, rather than just what the marketing department wants to be said. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016 edits[edit]

I initially reverted some recent additions to the article which are clearly copied from the subjects website, but even after reverting to an earlier version just about everything I see is traceable back to the organization's website. ~~I'm good apparent~~I've pared it back to a bare minimum rather than simply blow it away but if this article is to existed needs to be written by independent editors using multiple independent sources.--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: I've taken a hatchet to the article, but also added actually verifiable and notable text which the authors somehow decided not to include. It reads much more like a Wikipedia article and less like a press release now. --Slashme (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Slashme: Thanks, looks much better.--S Philbrick (Talk) 19:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]