Talk:Security Analysis (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggest rename[edit]

Suggest that this be renamed to Security_Analysis_(Book) (or at least italicized or otherwise placed in linking documents) to avoid clutter and confusion with other definitions of Security Analysis (i.e. physical or electronic auditing) or general securities (stock) analysis. Was confusing to link here from the See Also: section of "Fundamental Analysis" without realizing that it was a book review. 221.253.226.34 14:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there's another item with the exact same, causing confusion --Skarsa72 (talk) 23:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article. Hopefully I updated all necessary links and disambiguation stuff. Cretog8 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest external link[edit]

Suggest adding link to Chapter Summaries of Security Analysis--Skarsa72 (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested in WP:ELNO, item 11, generally links to blogs should be avoided unless the blogger is a recognized authority, so I don't see that link as appropriate (unless I'm missing something). Cretog8 (talk) 07:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does say normally such links should be avoided, but as written in WP:ELYES, item 4, sites with meaningful, relevant content such as reviews should be linked. In this case, these chapter-by-chapter reviews meet the criteria. --Skarsa72 (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm putting the link back since there appears to be only one person who removed it and is against it (same person), and this person hasn't responded to the argument that it should be linked --Skarsa72 (talk) 16:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I was taking a break, so didn't respond. I don't think that the criteria for meaningful, relevant content outweigh the objections to a blog as a source, particularly not when there's an apparent COI. So I still object. Cretog8 (talk) 20:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

76.99.99.96 (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First two paragraphs of book appear to be copied directly from book description as listed at:

http://www.learnoutloud.com/Sale-Section/Business/Investing-and-Finance/Security-Analysis/18493 76.99.99.96 (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]