Talk:Simonetti family

I guess that the person that tagged this article does not have any knowledge of the importance of the family to Tuscan history. Look into the Divine Comedy and books such as the historian Gammurrini. More information will be added in the future. Thank you.

Perhaps you could provide the references and cites that show the importance of the family. The article does not make it clear, and the purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to assign homework or place the burden of research onto the user.Magichands 23:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magichands is correct. It needs to be clear from the article why the subject is notable, and the burden to do so lies upon the author/creator, not upon the reader. A ecis ^{No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end} 02:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the critique. I am fixing and adding sources and information. I will also add more information on other families mentioned in the Divine Comedy.

I added two more references to the page. Thank you, 20 Jan 2007 Eddie

Corrected a few links and added new sources. Thank you, 25 Jan 2007 Eddie

I am adding more information on the Simonetti, Antelminelli and Quartigiani families. Thank you, 30 March 2007

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Simonetti family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051219105912/http://archivi.beniculturali.it/ASLU/patrimonio/curiarettori.html to http://archivi.beniculturali.it/ASLU/patrimonio/curiarettori.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 January 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 04:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simonetti family → Simonetti – No need for disambiguation, there is only a redirect. Gryffindor (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for WP:RECOGNIZABILITY and WP:NATURALNESS. I think that a shortened title would look artificial. No such user (talk) 11:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per WP:PRECISION; current title states clearly what the article is about; the proposed title is ambiguous. The current title is also consistent with other, similar titles (Anson family, House of Amboise etc.). Moonraker12 (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.