Talk:Simurgh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

If I remember correctly there is another Rushdie book that mentions the parliment of birds. "Semurg" is also discussed in Victor Pelevin's Generation P/Homo Zapiens/Babylon. 216.165.132.252 (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angha is not Simorgh[edit]

Why is Angha redirecting to Simorgh? Angha is the Arabic version of Ghoghnoos (Phoenix), which is completely different from Simorgh. Is there a reason why Angha is redirecting here that I don't know? I'll be happy to learn something new if anyone knows. Otherwise I think the redirect should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Definite1 (talkcontribs) 13:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qazaq samruk[edit]

Is this the same bird as the qazaq samruk, the one at the origin of the Bayterek?

The monument is meant to embody a folktale about a mythical tree of life and a magic bird of happiness: the bird, named Samruk, had laid its egg in the crevice between two branches of a poplar tree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.151.217.214 (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Bahram Alivandi myth.jpg[edit]

The image File:Bahram Alivandi myth.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simorgh.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Simorgh.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Senmurv[edit]

This creature, or one very like it, appears in Dungeons and Dragons by then name "Senmurv." Does this deserve a mention? Maybe "in popular culture" or some such? Brauden (talk) 03:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The senmurv, a dog-headed beast with wings certainly deserves mention, since it is an ancient Sassanian symbol, but is NOT the same creature as the simurgh, as the main article here claims. Representations of the simurgh are quite distinct from those of the senmurv. 10:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Dr. J. Jakeman, D.Phil, Oxon

Zal not albino[edit]

Although the Persian word zal means albino, the Shahnameh mentions that Zal had black skin or spotted skin. An albino would not have such coloring of the skin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.202.38 (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Simurgh symbol on flag of Tat people"[edit]

Is that actually a real flag? It's not referenced at all on the Tat people (Caucasus) page. The "Simurgh" on it appears to be virtually identical to a version of the Vauxhall Griffon (File:Vauxhall logo.png). When doing an image search for "tat people flag", all the results appear to come from a single DeviantArt account. Seems fishy. 31.185.168.201 (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Baba[edit]

So, 40 is innumerable, so 30 is big? btw why do they have an outoftheway word for 40 (number, ie two-wenty, three wenty, 5 wenty) in that Russian language?


He asked for a 13 but he got a 31[edit]

All your strength is in denial. Alle sagen: Vertrag per Handschlag. Ich sage: Schriftlich/verbindlich. Wasn´t there a movie, 'Gallipoli'?` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A540:2CC1:0:C548:76EE:F5:D403 (talk) 11:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]