Talk:Skepticism (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV?[edit]

The beginning of the article seems slightly opinionated to me... "They have contributed what is considered by some as the first real signs of progression in funeral doom since Thergothon, and one of best to ever expand on their genre and open horizons for new bands such as Shape of Despair to come into the genre." I don't know enough about the band to feel comfortable changing it, though. --Grant M 04:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article is written with non-neutral POVBeeblbrox (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to differ, the impact Skepticism have had since Stormcrowfleet is undeniable and many modern funeral doom bands acknowledge them as a major influence (the aforementioned Shape of Despair being probably the most high profile). In fairness that part is written in a very blunt manner but the fact is that Stormcrowfleet was a very original album when it was first released, featuring more prominent keyboards and muted vocals as well as a more free-flowing songwriting style (in comparison to Funeral and Thergothon), all of which are common practice amongst the more keyboard driven funeral Doom acts of today. Given this I don't see how there's anything wrong with acknowledging them as trend-setters because, simply, they were. Admittedly though, they weren't the first band to play with the formula of Funeral Doom, Funeral's Tragedies, released the year before, added classical guitars and female vocals to the mix so they (at least) represented progression within the style before Stormcrowfleet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.48.102 (talk) 17:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aes.jpg[edit]

Image:Aes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Skepticism (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]