Talk:Smalleye hammerhead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSmalleye hammerhead has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 24, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Smalleye hammerhead/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grondemar 05:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made some minor copyedits; beyond that this article looks good to me. It might be nice to add more pictures if possible, but I won't let that suggestion hold up GA status.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congratulations! Grondemar 05:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wrong sentence[edit]

This is a wrong sentence: ″This species has also been known to consume swimming crabs, squid, grunts, and newborn scalloped hammerheads.″

Because the smalleye hammerhead and the scalloped hammerhead doesn't live in the same ocean. It should be corrected. DenesFeri (talk) 09:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]