Talk:Sociology of science and technology
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Pretentious, moi?
[edit]It's no wonder that this article is not really worthy of wikipedia, its such a pretentious topic
- Cheers for your helpful contribution to the improvement of the Wikipedia project. Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Driller thriller 23:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- There are already a number of very similar articles to this one (sociology of science, sociology of knowledge, social epistemology, science and technology studies, etc etc). Therefore I have redirected this to sociology of science - an article which itself needs a great deal of work, but is certainly in a more advanced state than this one. --Tomsega (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)