Talk:Soluble NSF attachment protein

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CsikFejA.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator has not responded despite multiple pings (including two on talk page); closing as unsuccessful

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Sec17, a yeast homolog of SNAP

... that some bacterial toxins indirectly stop snaps (yeast homolog pictured)? Source: will pull the article cites on botulinum and tetanus
- Reviewed: working on it
- Comment: part of a Wiki Ed assignment

5x expanded by CsikFejA (talk). Nominated by Rotideypoc41352 (talk) at 16:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

A previous version of the article and of the hook called Sec17 a yeast ortholog. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - ?
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - ?
Interesting: - ?

QPQ: Done.

Overall: This is a worthy article, which has clearly involved a great deal of careful work. Thank you for this. The following improvements should be easy to carry out; if you could please do that, then this nomination should pass DYK.

(1) Typos:

"SNAP protein are localized" (proteins?),

"These proteins are contain transmembrane regions" (delete "are"?),

"Initial binding of NSF to SNAP been is likely related to interactions" (delete "been?),

"can take place under only conditions where a components and a membrane is present" (only under; a component),

"The SNARE theory of vesicle fusion, describes" (delete comma),

"These complex form similar structures" (complexes),

"step occurs prior to a calcium ion mediated fusion event, and thus revealing, that SNAP and NSF proteins initiate" (delete "and", delete comma after "revealing"),

"do not directly interact with SNAP, but the indirectly impact its ability" (the→they),

"become more sever over time" (severe),

"at the beginning of the century" (1900? 2000?),

"These structural finding have been confirmed" (findings),

"has been found both to be disease causing and has" (delete "both"; disease causing → cause disease),

"in disease course and development" (course → cause?),

"Aberrant of signaling and trafficking of proteins" (aberrance?),

"implication of it's role" (no apostrophe),

"may be potential target to improve" (a target, or targets?),

"the exact mechanism are yet to be identified" (mechanism or mechanisms?),

"until further experience with the platform is gather" (gathered).

(2) Too many paragraphs have no citation at the end. With this kind of exacting subject, all paragraphs should have a citation at the end, at the very least.
(3) You may possibly have a citation for the hook somewhere in the article, but, not being a scientist, I shall never find it without help. So please make sure that the facts of the hook are cited in the article, and write the links to the citations next to the hook on this template page, to help us, please.
(4) The hook is not uninteresting - I just don't understand it, and most readers will not understand it. Can you write a hook that a non-scientist might understand? For example, could you say that the study of snaps has helped scientists to understand more about e.g. Huntingdon's disease or whatever?
(5) You do not have to do a review (QPQ) because you do not yet have 5 or more DYKs. Storye book (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rotideypoc41352 I'm giving this 7 days to be taken care of. The nominator has edited a few times since the review and a talk page message. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marking for closure. SL93 (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]