User talk:BlueMoonset

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This editor is a Labutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, and Sticky Note.

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17


Clown[edit]

Hi, thanks for the inquiry. I won't be able to review the article. My Wiki time is very sparse and I don't have the time I used to have to devote to GA reviewing. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 00:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. The nomination has been returned to the GAN reviewing pool, and the review page deleted. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Tygerberg Zoo dyk[edit]

Hi - Thanks for reviewing my DYK nom at Template:Did you know nominations/Tygerberg Zoo. The article Tygerberg Zoo now passes the hurdle of being in mainspace, in case you could look at it again. :) --doncram 07:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: GA review[edit]

You're more than welcome to go ahead and revert the Boeing one. Based on his couple reviews it's clear the guy doesn't seem to get how the process works yet. I'd do it but I'm kinda done with GA for some time. Wizardman 14:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

GAR notification[edit]

Ideasthesia, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for We Built This Glee Club[edit]

Thanks from the wiki for your help Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Stalled GAN[edit]

Hi, thanks for your intervention. I'm sure you're right in your thoughts about this; I don't want to say anything that I haven't already, so please do something sensible. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Actually, it may be best simply to fail it now, so interested editors can work quietly on the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)