This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The page exists in both places. SONICFLOOd appears to be the correct way to write it, but this page has more work done on it. A move has been requested. -Goldom‽‽‽⁂ 04:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
This a s merge, that everybody who is interested can do. After merging, just make it a redirect. -- Kim van der Lindeat venus 02:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
A merge seems really sensible — after all, they're both talking about the same group, so we can't have both co-existing, and they both have good material in them. Any volunteers? talkGiler S 11:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
It seems the entire "History" section of this article was completely replaced at some point within the past year. Another website has appeared to have directly pulled the text from the previous Wikipedia entry in 2008 . I am proposing this text be restored, along with the links intact. The reason for this request is the text that was replaced uses better language and is written in a way that adheres more properly to Wikipedia's guidelines. The current text, as has been pointed out, does not cite references and is completely biased, almost reading like a press release from a record label. Please verify the restoration of the old text to make this article adhere to Wikipedia's standards.--Davim00 (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, so there's more to this than I thought. I came through the project a few days ago and blew away several blatant (c) violations, including this one. I just moved it back to my last revision, since I knew that it at least didn't have issues as large... but if there's a more optimal history available, go ahead and restore it. I'm standing by with 3-4 sources already for proper expansion. Just lemme know. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
After the mountain of recent expansion, feedback would be appreciated at this point. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)