Talk:Spike Freeman

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This redirect has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Liefeld

I removed the reference to Liefeld.

We cannot go around comparing real people to amoral psychoapths. Spike is evil. Liefeld is a real person. Actual libel cases have gone on because of situations like this.

Lots42 10:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Without a source it is original research. If there is a quote from the artist then it may be worth including - it isn't libel reporting then (although it might fall under the bibliography guidelines against anything too defamatory against living people). (Emperor 22:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I'm recalling the time that Todd McFarlane named a murderous mobster after a real-life hockey player. This got Todd sued. I just don't think we should touch situations like this, even second hand. If Mike Allerd wants to say he patterned a murderous psychopath after so and so, well, Wiki doesn't -have- to report it. Lots42 23:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We are perfectly in our rights to discuss situations like that without breaking any rules or leaving us equally liable. See e.g. Jonah Hex#Lawsuit. As long as the wording is right. (Emperor 02:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Maybe, but the supposed resemblance is not supported by an appropriate reference. As it is controversial and has been uncited for several months, I have removed it from the article. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]