Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants season 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Nose Knows and Slide Whistle Stooges[edit]

Have these 2 episodes premiered yet? It say's in the article that they premiered on June 11th and 12th, but I haven't seen them yet at all. Plus 2 episodes of spongebob are premiering next week. If they haven't really premiered here's what we should do. . . --Anfish (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Up[edit]

  • If the 2 episodes premiere next week, state that they were apart of the 5 something week (forgot the name of the marathon) on there discription.
  • Add that 5 of the season six episodes were apart of Spongebob's Premiere Factor 5. Not including the two episodes above.
  • Do not make the episode summary longer. The whole real episode in details will might spoil the reader.

For more info on clear up sections look here. --Anfish (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers[edit]

The synopses are very detailed but contain far too many spoilers. I can't see why a synopsis need contain anything other than a clear outline of the basic premise. Revealing how an episode ends not only sounds lame in print but ruins it for the reader/viewer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete3194 (talkcontribs) 12:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding WhoBob WhatPants![edit]

WhoBob WhatPants is on the season 5 volume 2 DVD box set. Therefor it is a season 5 episode, not a season 6 episode. Please stop reverting me edits! --SpongeSebastian (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

Should we add the controversy about Karen saying "crap(bad word for Y7)" or "crack(drinking, not suitable in Y7)" in "Komputer Overload"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Partysmorest (talkcontribs) 20:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a Controversy? --Spongeman537 (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Slumber Party / Grooming Gary[edit]

What Happened to them? Bring them back on the episode details. They're in production code 110. - Mario324 (talk)

It placed it back like you wanted but Some IP Address's are removing them and is vandailsm so watch out Marioluigi98 (talk)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 08:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The last sentence of first paragraph of Production lacks citation. RRD13 (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Royroydeb, or shall I say RRD13, for reviewing this article to GA. Anyway, I have added sources to the DVD. It can stand with that note but I think it's just OK. Mediran (tc) 23:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you please put light on this matter - "for an additional 26 episodes for a sixth season, surpassing the 100 episode mark". RRD13 (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Starting July 17, 2009 at 8:00 PM EDT"-why the time is given in North American zone?It should be given in GMT. RRD13 (talk) 16:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have removed the time as it is not that necessary. Mediran (tc) 02:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "while being at the 2010 Kids' Choice Awards Mexico for the same category"-does it mean that the program was nominated but did not win the award?Please write it clearly. RRD13 (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Done The show was only nominated. Mediran (tc) 03:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dont you think in the reception section it has become overdetailed by Marvis' comments and should also include comments from other personalities? RRD13 (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Added other reviews. Mediran (tc) 03:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]