Talk:Thad Luckinbill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yearbook picture[edit]

The picture of Thad Luckinbill as a freshman in high school is non-notable and unencyclopedic. He was not famous or notable when he was a freshman, and so I think the picture might just be being added in an attempt to embarrass him (yearbook pictures often have that effect). I am removing it accordingly. Please discuss here before it is re-added again. -kotra 22:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think your just Jealous that I have a yearbook picture of him and you don't...But in all seriousness, I think it is a perfectly necessary thing, I mean look at him, he was bound to be famous from that picture. I know more about him than you anyway....
66.76.240.146 18:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I bet you do, but I still don't think the high school picture is notable. I haven't seen high school or childhood pictures in any other biographies (unless they were famous at the time), so it's probably not just me who thinks so. But, if you still disagree, you're welcome to re-add it. I don't care much about it, personally. -kotra 19:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thad-luckinbill-09.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Thad-luckinbill-09.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Thad-luckinbill-09.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thad Luckinbill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More Family Background Needed[edit]

Is he related to Laurence Luckinbill, Lucie Arnaz, and the Wachowskis? Or completely unrelated to them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.95.174.225 (talk) 23:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to look up that information. If you can find such through reliable sources, then go ahead and add it. --Ebyabe (talk) 23:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A cursory search indicates the answer to your first question is no, and your second yes. If you can find more information from reliable sources, as I mentioned before, please do add it. Thanks. --Ebyabe (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]