Talk:The Big Moo
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
this article seems to be completely unsourced[edit]
Virtually none of this article can be related back to verifiable sources. I tried to add some but they were deleted. Seems to be all original research I suggest the article is deleted unless it is properly written. Comments? Suggestions? Jamesrand (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Article is consistent with sources provided. The original draft was primarily based on the Miami Herald article. Editors must purchase said article for about $3 in order to view it's contents on line.--Nowa (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure this does not qualify as a verifiable source if the editors are required to purchase it. I am putting the proposed deletion tag back in to get more people involved on this decision as I cannot find any other sources (other than the primary source) that support anything in the article. Jamesrand (talk) 15:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)