Talk:The Sisters Grimm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Sisters Grimm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Please refrain from chatting here. This page is for discussing issues concerning the Sisters Grimm article only. Thank you. 74.221.36.132 (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)EpicSitcom74.221.36.132 (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 12/30/09[reply]

ex-mayor: Prince Charming[edit]

Shouldn't Prince Charming just be put as "Prince Charming!? After all, he still is mayor in the first and second books as well as most of the third. Besides,it kinda ruins it for first time Sister Grimm readers. They don't know that Prince Charming is replaced by... i'll just type it. Queen of Hearts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.166.83 (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Books Without Articles[edit]

I have noticed that many of the books in the series do not have their own articles. I am asking for this to be changed. I do not have an account, so I may not create one. Please consider this. 74.96.4.195 (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Anonymous Reader.[reply]

Can you find an established precedent for equivalence book series having separate articles per book? Does that meet the relevance standards? If so, I could help with this process. Trogdor314 (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis[edit]

Its probably silly of me, but I don't think Elvis should be listed as a minor character. He is VERY important!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.238.254 (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uncle jake/jacob grimm[edit]

I think that it is totally wrong that uncle jake/jacob grimm isn't mentioned as one of the characters!!!! P.S. I am also in favor of listing Elvis as a mojor character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.80.75 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 15 April 2011‎

Spoilers[edit]

Is it just me, or do other people think this page contains SPOILERS? I mean, I've read them all, but if I hadn't, I would be very disspointed to know some of these things. 98.226.198.164 (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Liberty[reply]

Charming[edit]

Uh... HELLO?! Charming isn't a minor character!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.198.164 (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RED RIDING HOOD, MINOR CHARACTER?[edit]

SHE ON THE FRONT COVER OF THE THRID BOOK FOR PETE'S SAKE? SHE'S PART OF THE GRIM FAMILY, SHE HAD POSSESSION OVER THERE PARENTS FOR A WHILE, AND THERE LITTLE BROTHER, SHE IS KINDA RESPONSIBLE FOR LIKE 1/8 OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPEN IN THE SERIES, SHE HAS A SERIOUS CONNECTION/FRIENDSHIP WITH MR.CANIS AND INHERITS THE WOLF'S POWER. AND UNLIKE CANIS CAN ACTUALLY CONTROL IT, REALLY? RED RIDING HOOD IS A MINOR CHARACTER? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.65.135 (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sisters Grimm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120164719/http://www.kirkusreviews.com/kirkusreviews/images/pdf/kr_childrens_best_1205.pdf to http://www.kirkusreviews.com/kirkusreviews/images/pdf/kr_childrens_best_1205.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]