Talk:Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon 2

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

NK Rifles[edit]

The Type 95, Type 91, and Type 87A are all real guns. I'm surprised there aren't articles on them. I might make them at some point unless some else is willing to stand up and do so. Thmars10 02:46, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think there are articles for those weapons, just under different names. (such as "QBZ-95" is the "T-95") I know they often change weapon designations in games... -Albrozdude 06:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Type 87A is actually the Type 81 rechambered for the Chinese 5.8 x 42 round. Cabez 01:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Plot at all?[edit]

No spoilers about the plot at all? -- Kschang77 07:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missions[edit]

The number of and names of the campaign missions are not listed. I will add them soon if no one objects, and replace "several" with the number of missions. 172.141.227.227 17:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I listed them numbered and in chronological order THEBOMB2021 (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Year[edit]

The year is 2011? I thought on one mission it said 7/7/2007 (I know it because thats when I actually played the game). -Flubeca^Talk 00:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lose sleep over it. It's been mentioned in the article that there are two campaigns. The Xbox version's campaign is the quasi-sequel to that of the PS2 and Gamecube versions. Apparently whoever wrote the storyline focused on the XBox game. Eaglestorm 05:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It gets quirkier. If the PS2 version is set in 2007, it would be a prequel to the first game which is set in 2008 (with the expansions covering 2009-2010). However the XBox version is set in 2011 making that game a true sequel. (69.236.65.47 (talk) 03:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah, the PS2 version pretty much retcons the Ghosts themselves in general. In the original Ghost Recon, they were portrayed as more of a specialized light infantry unit (like the US Army Rangers or the 10th Mountain Division), whereas GR2 took a Tier 1 SMU approach and portrayed them as more in line with Delta Force or DEVGRU. So you have Mitchell's "Tier 1 SMU" Ghost team appearing in 2007, the "light infantry" Ghosts appearing in the 2008 to 2010 period, then the return of Mitchell's "Tier 1 SMU" Ghosts in 2011. I've played the PS2 version and enjoyed it, but it really screwed up the continuity of the franchise. lol Spartan198 (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It’s exactly like splinter cell chaos theory time scale is 2007 THEBOMB2021 (talk) 18:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GR2GCBox.jpg[edit]

Image:GR2GCBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

content?[edit]

Why is it rated T? I bought the used version and it didnt say why. im wondering if i should return it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.49.0.4 (talk) 00:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS2 Version[edit]

Personally, I think we need to re add the plot to the PS2 version. Splinter Cell: Double Agent mentions both new and old versions. Plus, the PS2 version of Ghost Recon 2 is different from the Xbox version. I just thought we should consider it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.18.82 (talk) 01:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]