Talk:Triangulation (chess)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
reference for diagram and moves[edit]
- I think I put in the example, but it did not come from Flear 2004. I don't remember which book it came from - I'd like to reference it. Bubba73 (talk), 18:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Reference found and added (just a few minutes later, on 10 Aug 2006). Bubba73 (talk), 22:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Shirov-Grischuk example[edit]
I don't suppose anybody knows any more details about the Shirov-Grischuk example given in this article (or if Silman gives more details in his book)? It's a very nice example, but I can't seem to find the source game in any databases. --Camembert (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Silman's book gives about 2½ pages on that ending, this article only talks about a small part of it, dealing with the triangulation. Silman starts about 11 moves before the triangulation and goes for about 9 more moves. Bubba73 (talk), 16:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- ...except that their match didn't go to tie-breaks[1], and none of the games in it reached this position. It doesn't even look to me like the position could have occured in an analysis variation from any of them (game one did go to a pawn ending, but it never resembled the diagram position very much). Very strange. Anyway, not a big deal, the article gives a reference and the position is interesting no matter what its origin. I'm still curious about it, but it's probably not a big deal as far as the article is concerned. --Camembert (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)