Talk:Tu Recuerdo (Ricky Martin song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested moves[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to place the Ricky Martin song at the plain title, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


– Ignoring the fact that @Magiciandude: has been moving several pages arbitrarily, no other topic listed at Tu Recuerdo indicates this song is not primary than the other entries, as Magician says. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 07:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment What do you mean? I don't move pages unless there were other notable songs of the name which is what primary topic deals with. Erick (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) "Tu Recuerdo" is just as notable because it ranked on the Billboard charts and it was nominated a Lo Nuestro Award for Tropical Song of the Year. Solo Pienso Ti, there was a famous song by Rodrigo Garcia and it was covered by Guillermo Davila and Jerry Rivera, both becoming notable hits too. Notable to me means songs that ranked on music charts and have a won or was nominated a significant award. That's why I also made Si Tu Te Vas and Como Duele disambiguation pages. In the case Si Tu Te Vas, you have Los Temerario's song reaching #1 on the Hot Latin Songs chart, Camilo Sesto's song being covered by different artists. I use the chart search on Billboard.biz to see if any other songs or albums of the same name ranked on the charts. Erick (talk) 23:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - there's no primary topic for a phrase as generic as "Tu Recuerdo" plus oppose per WP:NCM where other songs exist. Note: A warning to Tbhotch again to avoid WP:PA personal attack language "arbitrarily" in comments on other editors. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • What about if you fuck off? That is a personal attack, and I frankly have had enough from you asshole. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:NCM. There is no indication that this relatively WP:RECENT song has far greater long-term notability than the set of all other candidates with the same topic name. Question: Does this article reference any reliable sources that discuss the topic in detail? (If not, it may fail WP:GNG and perhaps should be deleted or redirected for lack of notability. To me the article looks pretty "thin". Will it ever consist of much more than chart lists?) —BarrelProof (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Considering the volatility of the popularity of pop music, I tend to be rather reluctant about assigning primary status to any particular work (especially relatively WP:RECENT ones). —BarrelProof (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • May I remind people that NCM is a guideline and as such to interpret "When necessary" as a compulsory item has to be incorrect. The correct interpretation is that there cannot be two titles exactly the same, and to add (band), (song), (album), as appropriate when (i.e. "when necessary") there is another article with the same title (but specifically not another band, song or album, which is then covered in the second paragraph of WP:SONGDAB). Simple really! --Richhoncho (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC which says this particular "Your Memory" must be more significant (including long term) than all other "Your Memory." topics. The nominator knows I dislike primarytopic applied to music. Also WP:NCM applies, as ever. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Christian Nieves[edit]

Where's mention of Christian Nieves (the cuatro soloist) in the article? 199.61.25.254 (talk) 17:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tu Recuerdo (Ricky Martin song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "on the Valentine's Day" – is the "the" necessary?
  • Add a hyphen between "longest running".
  • Remove the comma after "El Factor X in 2007".
  • "season one of singing competition" → "season one of the singing competition"
  • "first season of American edition" → "first season of the American edition"
  • Sources are archived and reliable.
  • Images are properly tagged. No other issues.
@Some Dude From North Carolina:  Done, thank you so much. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed