Talk:Turbo C++
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Please add a screenshot of Turbo C++ 2006.
The old screenshot may cause readers to instantly depart without realizing the current version offers a modern GUI.
I disagree with this anonymous request for two reasons:
- Turbo C++ is, franklopment tool of the early 90s than it is today.
- The historical screen shots are more important in showing the software in its prime, which many users may have never seen, don't have, or can't run - anyone who wants to can download and run the modern TC++.
Of course, I use Linux exclusively now and couldn't do a screen shot of TC++ if I wanted to. Scott1329m 12:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think there is a rule against multiple screenshots. Include both historical and current screens, with appropriate captions. VanishingUser 01:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Umm...was there really a "Turbo C++ 4.0"? I remember Turbo C++ 3.1 (Windows) and 4.5 (Windows), but I thought 4.0 was strictly a Borland C++ release. 12 March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.14.141.69 (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC) happy lng naman ako sa pag ti2ngin d2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.117.102 (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Codeplex Version
[edit]Has https://turboc.codeplex.com/ this anything to do with Borland's version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andwan0 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- This is a link to pirated software. Yes, it looks to be Turbo C++, but for obvious reasons, we can't include the link in the article. --Yamla (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Program
[edit]- include<iostream.h>
- include<conio.h>
- include<math.h>
Void main() { Clrscr(); Int a,b,c,d; Cout<<"enter the numbers"<<endl; Cin>>a>>b; C=a+b; Cout<<" the sum of these numbers is:"<<c<<endl; d=a*b; Cout<<"the product of these numbers is:"<<d<<endl; Getch(); } Ali hamza ah (talk) 15:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is not a valid C++ program, nor would it be an appropriate use of the talk page even if it was. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)