This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Question Why exactly has this been proposed for deletion? It looks like it could be greatly expanded and it needs sources but if it's really the second-largest Hispanic food supplier in the Northeastern U.S. I would say it should be worth at least a stub, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prezuiwf (talk • contribs)
Oppose deletion - When I created the article, I made sure that it asserted its notability. The article stated that the company is the second largest Hispanic food distributor in Northeastern US, I believe that's clearly an assertion of notability. Dionyseus 08:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion. It looks notable, as a large distributor of Hispanic foods. Let's inquire seriously into this first, before making a snap judgement. We need to be deliberate and reasonable with all actions we take here at Wikipedia. Badagnani 08:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion. If Goya Foods gets an article, so should this. grendel|khan 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but Goya is an international brand. Vitarroz is a regional distributor. There's a big difference there. Please keep in mind that this is not an AfD discussion. Oppose deletion doesn't mean anything on a talk page. --Адам12901Talk 08:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is inappropiate to speedy tag an article that asserts notability. If an article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletions, you should put it in AfD instead. Dionyseus 08:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not feel that this article asserted notability. That's why I tagged it for speedy deletion. --Адам12901Talk 09:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The statement "second largest supplier and distributor in northeastern United States" is an assertion of notability which instantly excludes the article from being speedy deleteable as an A7. Dionyseus 09:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
