Talk:Wake Up and Escape from the Citadel

Wake Up and Escape from the Citadel has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 25, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

Cartoon Network Low‑importance

	Cartoon Network portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gen. Quon: Will take (again). Expect a review in the week or next week. ₂₃W 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

@Gen. Quon: Reviewing this now since I'm going on break until January. The merge looks good, but here are some comments:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Lead is way too long at four paragraphs, should be shortened to at most two per WP:LEADLENGTH (I know other episode articles have three, but even those are looking too long).
I merged it into three. How does it look now? I know it's still a bit long, but considering this is two episodes smashed into one article, I feel it makes sense.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All sources are reliable, and the self-published sources are acceptable per WP:ABOUTSELF.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Why did you get rid of the cultural references section of Escape from the Citadel? I thought that was cool, and it gave the io9 source.
Whoops. I just forgot to move it. It's there now.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I could pick on the lengthy quotes in the reception section, but overall this looks nice. Can't really pick on the prose much. On hold for two weeks. ₂₃W 01:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay. How's it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gen. Quon: Looks good! Though if you take it to FAC, I'd recommend reordering the lead and reception section for length's sake. Pass. ₂₃W 04:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20141008204942/http://new.spring.me/%23!/MrMuto/q/359574790920490474 to http://new.spring.me/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]