Talk:Walter Latham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Walter Latham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede changes[edit]

Hello - On this page, the article's first sentence identified Latham as African-American. I think, in this case, that's probably not relevant enough to his notability to mention very first in the article, per MOS:ETHNICITY. While it's true that Latham's productions revolve largely around African-American comedians, he's a businessman and an entertainment mogul, and that's not particularly strongly tied to race in the way I think MOS:ETHNICITY means it. I moved the ethnicity into the biographical section about his early life; previously, I wouldn't have done this since it's unsourced, but to address concerns about erasure, I can now refrain from removing it. I guess there's a question of whether it's relevant to identify him as African-American somewhere in the lede other than at the very first position - perhaps in the second or third sentence of the lede; to be honest, I don't think I would object to anyone restoring ethnicity to later in the lede who thought it is important enough to do so, even if I disagreed. Chubbles (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, to try and address concerns raised by SusunW, I tweaked the second sentence of the lede. I'd trust a consensus that stated it was important to note that Latham specifically championed the careers of black entertainers in the lede, so I adjusted the second sentence to better capture that. Chubbles (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chubbles for weighing my response. I did not reply here, as it is often difficult to follow conversations on multiple pages, but it may be helpful for readers to see what my response was and the broader discussion. SusunW (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to keep the conversation on one page too as it is less confusing. But I think to say his notability and his productions being predominantly of African Americans are unrelated is naive. ☕ Antiqueight chatter 22:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone's arguing they're unrelated. I'm not sure I follow the logic there. Chubbles (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]