Talk:Wei-Ling Gallery

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Multiple Issues[edit]

How do I fix all these multiple issues?

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (September 2023)

This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (September 2023)

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for geographic features. (May 2021)

Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (May 2021)

Alice2901 (talk) 04:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

weiling-gallery.com is a wp:Primary source and is not considered a wp:reliable source. e.g. ...is a prominent art gallery in Malaysia is sourced by weiling-gallery.com They call themselves "prominent"? Rather self-serving?
Does the article meet wp:GNG? Much content is sourced by weiling-gallery.com
wp:puffery including
- Located in a pre-war building in the distinctive suburb of Brickfields
- ...is a prominent art gallery in Malaysia again "Prominent"
- The Malaysian maestros of the arts scene that are represented by the gallery are... not encyclopedic, unsourced "maestros"
Adakiko (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Adakiko! Thanks for your feedback. Will look into the rewriting. Appreciate that! Alice2901 (talk) 12:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might peruse some of the art gallery articles in the USA for some examples. Not all are guaranteed to be written according to policy. The way the article is written at the moment archive link is closer to how it should read than before.. (Encyclopedic, dry, boring...) Needs many primary / weiling-gallery.com links replaced with secondary links. Primary/self-serving citations are higher priority than something like the Philanthropy and corporate collaboration section.
Section headers should use sentence case: MOS:HEADINGS.
The citation for the CORUM bowls does not indicate where they came from nor that the gallery worked with CORUM. Example: The source could written the same if the bowls were found in a trash dump. It would be better if there was a link to a news site about this and the other collaborations.
I would recommend asking at the wp:Teahouse. You should get more accurate answers than my babblings here! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]