Template:Did you know nominations/Antonio Fantuzzi
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Antonio Fantuzzi[edit]
Mars and Venus Bathing, etching
- ... that Antonio Fantuzzi's "mildly licentious" etching of Mars and Venus Bathing (c. 1543, pictured) probably copies a painting in the six-room bath suite of the Palace of Fontainebleau? Source: not the one used, but per the British Museum "it is possible that it was designed for the decoration of the Appartement des Bains, Fontainebleau. Also see 'École de Fontainebleau', Paris 1972, cat. No.323, 'Fontainebleau et l'estampe en France au XVIe siècle, iconographie et contradictions', Nemours 1985, cat. No.122; 'The French Renaissance in Prints', Los Angeles 1994, cat. No.44 [this is the source used - as "Boorsch"]; and 'Primaticcio', Paris 2004, cat. No.80.
- Reviewed: Wei Liaoweng
- Comment: Expanded from one-liner
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 15:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC).
First of all, lovely article. Checked for prose (newly expended on Jan 8; interesting, long enough, neutral, properly cited, no plagiarism); images all in order; QPQ done; hook is interesting and within length requirements, and I will AGF on the Boorsch reference verifying it; however, one citation in the text appears to cite a sources not provided as reference -- in note 19, we get this: As described by the British Museum: "the goddess, standing on the left next to the olive tree with Hermes on her side, is already crowned by Nike; on the right, Poseidon is holding the horse; in the upper part, an assembly of gods attending the contest". This needs to be used transformed into a cited reference, perhaps with the (archived?) link to the British Museum entry for that item; simply using "as described by the British Museum" isn't proper form, unless we indicate where, in the citation.Dahn (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
