Template:Did you know nominations/Humphrey IV of Toron
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Humphrey IV of Toron[edit]
Humphrey and Isabella's marriage
- ... that Humphrey IV of Toron married Isabella of Jerusalem (their marriage pictured) in Kerak Castle in 1183, but a siege by Saladin disturbed the wedding? Source: "The religious marriage of Humphrey IV of Toron and the king's sister Isabel had been arranged for the autumn of 1183 ... This took place at Kerak ... [Saladin] was almost certainly aware of what was happening. it is therefore likely that he planned his attack on Kerak to coincide with the festivities... Saladin set out from Damascus on 22 October. The most vivid account of the siege is that of Ernoul..." (Hamilton, Bernard (2000). The Leper King and His Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge University Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-521-64187-6.)
- ALT1:... that Humphrey IV of Toron swore fealty to the new king of Jerusalem, Guy of Lusignan, instead of claiming the throne? Source: "When news of the coronation [of Guy of Lusignan] reached Nablus, Raymond III proposed to the barons there that they should proclaim Humphrey and Isabel of Toron king and queen. This plan was a piece of criminal folly ... and Humphrey of Toron refused to be a party to it. Leaving Nablus secretly by night he made his submission to Guy." (Hamilton, Bernard (2000). The Leper King and His Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge University Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-521-64187-6.)
- Reviewed: Genoplesium littorale
Improved to Good Article status by Borsoka (talk). Self-nominated at 04:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC).
Promoted to GA within the past week. I read through the article and there doesn't seem to be anything that the GA reviewer has missed – everything's sourced (offline sources, but all seem reliable and scholarly) and the prose is fine. Both images have free licences. I think the first hook is the most interesting – thanks for including a quotation from the text so it could be verified. Good to go, nice job. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 08:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
