Template:Did you know nominations/Monmouth cap

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Monmouth Cap[edit]

Woollen Monmouth cap

Created/expanded by Ghmyrtle (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 16:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

  • St Davids Day is the 1st of March when leeks are meant to be worn...

Article is well-written and well-cited. Hook is cited and interesting. Pic has the proper licensing. I'd say we're good to go! --Coemgenus (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Coemgenus - I shall move this to March 1st as MonmouthpediA should be there for St David's Day Victuallers (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Can I suggest this image is used instead? The only known example of an original Monmouth Cap, dating from the 16th century, on display at Monmouth Museum Mrjohncummings (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm concerned that some of the phrasing in this article is nearly identical to that used by this source. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I have changed the image to the one suggested and treaked the text. There are some false positives thrown up because of the long (and relevant) quote. I think you'll find its OK now Victuallers (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Further tweaked a little - hope I haven't made it worse! Apologies for my originally inadequate paraphrasing - what I assumed to be technical terminology concerning knitting styles is not something I felt qualified to change substantially. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I have gone through this and there seems to be no major paraphrasing concerns now (not counting direct quotations). This is good to go again. Cheers, Zangar (talk) 13:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)