Template talk:The Inheritance Cycle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconInheritance Cycle NA‑class (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Inheritance Cycle, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.
NAThis article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNovels Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconChildren's literature Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Things you can do

Getting too big?[edit]

It might just be me... but this template seems to be getting a little big. I'm not saying anything should be removed; on the contrary, I think that most of the links are pretty important. I think it would be perfectly possible to merge the "Organizations" and "Clans" rows into one, since neither are particularly long. I would say, however, that the Elf and Dwarf links are rather unhelpful, as they're not specific to the Inheritance Trilogy.

In fact, I think I'll do that now for my piece of mind. If anybody disagrees and has a good reason for it we can change it back. If I mess up the formatting or something major... remember that the old version is just a revert away. UnaLaguna 06:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing[edit]

A good deal of the articles on the front have been redirected. Would a tech savvy person edit accordingly? I don't want to screw the template up. — i said 01:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the redirects, kept the articles on AFD (which can be removed depending on the outcome), reduced from eight rows to three. I might see if I can do something about the spacing of the columns. Una LagunaTalk 09:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]