Template talk:Unverified

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis redirect is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconReference works NA‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
NAThis article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Edit request[edit]

{{editprotected}} Please replace this page with: {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Image|{{nosource}}|{{unreferenced}}}} Melsaran 13:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

No pages in the image namespace us this template, and at most half a dozen in the main namespace. Rich Farmbrough, 15:17 29 August 2007 (GMT).

Changing to redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 13:02 25 September 2007 (GMT).

unreferenced or refimprove[edit]

Should this tag include {{unreferenced}} (as it does now) or {{refimprove}} (which I think might be better)? Ewlyahoocom 18:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a moot point. What does the word "unverified" mean - I would say that references have been added but not checked. Well we don't have a program of checking references out (yet). It doesn't really mean wither of the above, and I would hope we could just stop using it altogerer... Rich Farmbrough, 19:15 28 September 2007 (GMT).

Edit request 07 October 2011[edit]

The code in this template is causing error messages with Rdcheck. Please update the code to: #REDIRECT [[Template:Unreferenced]] because the colon should not be there right after the bracket. Thanks, --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This doesn't seem to be an isolated problem. Why doesn't Rdcheck get fixed to accept all valid variations of redirect syntax instead? Anomie 22:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]