Two-factor authentication

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Two factor authentication)
Jump to: navigation, search

Two-factor authentication (also known as 2FA) is 1984 technology[1] that provides identification of users by means of the combination of two different components. These components may be something that the user knows, something that the user possesses or something that is inseparable from the user. A good example from everyday life is the withdrawing of money from a cash machine. Only the correct combination of a bank card (something that the user possesses) and a PIN (personal identification number, i.e. something that the user knows) allows the transaction to be carried out. 2FA is ineffective against modern threats,[2] like ATM skimming, phishing, and malware etc. Two-factor authentication is a type of multi-factor authentication.

Components[edit]

The use of two-factor authentication to prove one's identity is based on the premise that an unauthorized actor is unlikely to be able to supply both factors required for access. If in an authentication attempt at least one of the components is missing or supplied incorrectly, the user's identity is not established with sufficient certainty and access to the asset (e.g., a building, or data) being protected by two-factor authentication then remains blocked. The authentication factors of a two-factor authentication scheme may include:

  • some physical object in the possession of the user, such as a USB stick with a secret token, a bank card, a key, etc.
  • some secret known to the user, such as a username, password, PIN, TAN, etc.
  • some physical characteristic of the user (biometrics), such as a fingerprint, eye iris, voice, typing speed, pattern in key press intervals, etc.[3]

Mobile phone two-factor authentication[edit]

The major drawback of authentication performed using something that the user possesses and one other factor is that the plastic token used (the USB stick, the bank card, the key or similar) must be carried around by the user at all times. And if this is stolen or lost, or if the user simply does not have it with him or her, access is impossible. There are also costs involved in procuring and subsequently replacing tokens of this kind. In addition, there are inherent conflicts and unavoidable trade-offs between usability and security.

Mobile phone two-factor authentication was developed to provide an alternative method that would avoid such issues. This approach uses mobile devices such as mobile phones and smartphones to serve as "something that the user possesses". If users want to authenticate themselves, they can use their personal access licence (i.e. something that only the individual user knows) plus a one-time-valid, dynamic passcode consisting of digits. The code can be sent to their mobile device by SMS or via a special app. An alternative method for authentication, iSMS embeds the authentication code into the headers (e.g. originating address) so that the user only needs to reply to the message in order to authorize and authenticate. The advantage of both of these methods is that there is no need for an additional, dedicated token, as users tend to carry their mobile devices around at all times anyway. Some professional two-factor authentication solutions also ensure that there is always a valid passcode available for users. If the user has already used a sequence of digits (passcode), this is automatically deleted and the system sends a new code to the mobile device. And if the new code is not entered within a specified time limit, the system automatically replaces it. This ensures that no old, already used codes are left on mobile devices. For added security, it is possible to specify how many incorrect entries are permitted before the system blocks access.

Advantages of mobile phone two-factor authentication:

  • No additional tokens are necessary because it uses mobile devices that are (usually) carried all the time.
  • As they are constantly changed, dynamically generated passcodes are safer to use than fixed (static) log-in information.
  • Depending on the solution, passcodes that have been used are automatically replaced in order to ensure that a valid code is always available; acute transmission/reception problems do not therefore prevent logins
  • The option to specify a maximum permitted number of false entries reduces the risk of attacks by unauthorized persons

Disadvantages of mobile phone two-factor authentication:

  • The mobile phone must be carried around by the user at all times.
  • The battery of the mobile phone must be charged.
  • The mobile phone must get a usable cellular signal.
  • The user must share their personal mobile number with the provider, reducing personal privacy.
  • If the mobile phone is stolen or lost, or if the user simply does not have it with him or her, access is impossible. In addition, there are costs involved in procuring and subsequently replacing mobile phones.
  • Not everyone has a mobile phone, so some people may be excluded from becoming users unless alternate provisions are made.
  • Text messages may cost the user money to receive, discouraging use; mobile roaming fees tend to be higher when the user is away from home or in another country, a time when secondary authentication is more likely to be requested.
  • Text messages to mobile phones using the Short Message Service are insecure and can be intercepted and are often unreliable. The token can thus be stolen and used by third parties.[4]
  • Text messages may have delivery lags, frustrating the user's desire to log in immediately.
  • Text messages are often visible on phones which are locked, and Apple devices distribute text-messages over iMessage to family members etc on other devices, all making codes easy to steal.

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.google.com/patents/US4720860
  2. ^ https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/02/the_failure_of_2.html
  3. ^ "What is 2FA?". Retrieved 19 February 2015. 
  4. ^ SSMS – A Secure SMS Messaging Protocol for the M-Payment Systems, Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'08), pp. 700–705, July 2008 arXiv:1002.3171

See also[edit]