User talk:Vladislav1968

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Vladislav1968)

Welcome!

Hello, Vladislav1968, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Sophia 17:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we delete this list[edit]

Some people are selective they would like to see only lists of their own domination, what do u think does this list warrant deletion or should we let it stay?[1]--יודל 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add Messianic Judaism to the article about Judaism. As Messianic Judaism says, "Jews of all denominations and many Christians do not consider Messianic Judaism to be a form of Judaism". Continued attempts to insert the deleted material will be considered vandalism and will be dealt with appropriately. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vladislav

I undid a change of yours on this article. Artilces are not the place to ask questions - please use the talk pages for that. Thanks. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you. But link which was before wasn't correct. Vladislav1968 20 March 2008

Daniel Zion[edit]

You may be the best placed to write something about him. Bear in mind WP:POV and WP:Verifiability guidelines or policies. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messianic Judaism[edit]

With all due respect, I went to the talk pages and explained the reason for the deletion of the last part of the sentence. It is misleading to quote the author as if he was speaking for Jewry - he was not. Cohn-Sherbok was making a scholarly point of his own. It is therefore an absolute stretch to state that his book shows "exceptions". Best, A Sniper 21:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)