Jump to content

User talk:Zppix/2017/January

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Happy New Year, Zppix!

Happy New Year!

Zppix,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year Zppix!

Happy New Year!
Zppix,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Happy New Year!

Hello Zppix: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Submission declined on 30 December 2016 by Zppix

Hi Zppix,

I have updated only information and the services that Uniworld Logistics provide. Your declination says it is like an advertisement. I think you should consider it. Apart of that, i am also trying to improve it more. Please consider it and give me one more chance to make the page live.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Uniworld_Logistics

13:38:01, 3 January 2017 review of submission by FragileDiamonds


Hi thanks for reviewing my article draft and Happy New Year to you. I have read the guidelines and some other examples of articles which have been published on Wikipedia in a similar field and I'm really confused as to what is not regarded as notable. Please take a look at the following articles and their references for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathstore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VictoriaPlum.com https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_Bathrooms

From my research these are two similar topics and as far as I can see have a similar amount of sources of a very similar notoriety. Could you please tell me what these articles have done differently to gain entry based on the guidelines mentioned? This is my first ever draft and this all may seem quite obvious but I'm really struggling to see why the sources I've used for my article aren't notable.

Thank you

Please comment on Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

15:04:02, 4 January 2017 review of submission by 37.203.168.68



Sources used in the article are from leading industry publications in the UK for mortgages and alternative finance (including peer-to-peer lending) publications. Because you are unfortunately not aware of these publications (or the relevant industries), it does not make them not significant or not notable. Also, the post https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LendInvest contain 30 sources, of which around 10 are also included in the relevant article. Apparently, these sources were deemed notable in this article but not for the relevant article.

RE: JewHater's page

I hear you! I did ABF to him. However, I didn't personally attack him, remember his handle is "JewHater420" which literally says he's a Jew Hater and a stoner. I agree that what I said was passive-agressive and could have been handled better, so I've removed the passive agreesive portion of my message. KoshVorlon 19:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

17:37:20, 10 January 2017 review of submission by 184.190.28.83


Hello Zppix,

I hope your day is going well. I'm writing because this article got rejected again after numerous edits and attempts of getting this published. I edited the previous article based on the comments by the previous reviewer and for some reason it got rejected again. I'm a little confused as to why because Custom Building Products is linked from other wikipedia articles. Here are some examples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAP_Products https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_Beach,_California (under employers)

Let me know how we can edit the article if it sounds too "self-promoting" as well so I can finally get this article published.

Please comment on Talk:Betsy DeVos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Betsy DeVos. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 15:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

David Dylan‎

I'm getting very close to taking this to ANI. Now he's saying I wrote things I didn't, and editing my previous posts to make it appear that I did [1]. You said you were willing to mentor him. If you still want to do that I suggest that you have a word with him. My WP:AGF is done. Meters (talk) 23:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

@Meters: mind joining IRC, I wanna discuss something. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
done Meters (talk) 00:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Request on 17:50:46, 19 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by TheSandDoctor


@Zppix: May I ask why my submission was declined as being non-notable? I am surprised as Ali-A has over 8.6 million YouTube subscribers, holds four Guinness World Records and has been interviewed on several occasions by the BBC (even being a subject of a radio documentary) as well as appearing on The Gadget Show. Do you have any suggestions to improve the article so that it is accepted?
Thanks for your time. TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: will be able to help you with this way better than I could Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Editor ot the Week

Welcome aboard! Always great to have a helping hand. Good luck with cleaning up in the Hall of Fame. Buster Seven Talk 04:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

@Buster7:Thanks, seeing I was already apart of WP:RETENTION, and I saw in IRC JustBerry needing a helping hand, I thought why not, it can't be too hard. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 16:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:William McKinley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:William McKinley. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your email

I was giving him a bit more time, and things were looking good, until [2]. He just does not get the copyright issue. Reposting the copyright vio onto the talk page and asking if he can just change the order of the lines? What to do? Meters (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

@Meters:  Acknowledged however I'm always on IRC (usually) if you need to tell me anything, or just to chat (you can message me on irc by typing /msg Zppix messagegoeshere. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 22:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Request on 17:57:25, 23 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Julielenhard


Hello, I work in the marketing department for the company, Outdoor Voices. I am trying to publish a wikipedia page for the company, however it keeps on getting rejected. I have included many reputable sources to back up the facts that have been noted in this article. Do you have any further insight as to how to successfully publish this article?


Julielenhard (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

@Julielenhard:, @SwisterTwister:, he know more about this kind of thing than me, he will be able to help you better then I could. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 22:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I was just curious as to why the Super Robot Wars logo has a twinkle and cannot be transferred to Wikimedia Commons? Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 22:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC) @Iftekharahmed96: because non-free images arent allowed on Commons. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 13:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

07:22:33, 27 January 2017 review of submission by Mahi kapoor

Please comment on Talk:Katherine Johnson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Katherine Johnson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zppix/2017/January&oldid=1075877407"