User talk:\\'arrior 786

Afghanistan

Click here to leave a new message

Your edits on the Afghanistan page[edit]

Hello Warrior786,

I kindly suggest for the next time you start giving sources that state that there was state forming or anything close to the entity of a state in Afghanistan during the IVC and Achaemenid times, instead of dropping tags on people's talk pages that they shouldnt reflect their own opinions which you just copy/paste recklessly from some WP article.

There was no such thing as state forming in what is now Afghanistan until the rise of Mirwais Hotak in 1709, and that was alredy mentioned in the infobox, until you added the IVC and Achaemenid era's to it as well without any source or whatsoever.

If you can't bring any sources that prove that your edits are right and you will keep reverting it, we will have to bring this to WP:ANI.

Thanks

- Jbh ^Talk 16:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User rights[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you are listing your account as having Reviewer, Rollback, and Filemover permissions when in fact you do not. If you use Twinkle it shows an option to 'rollback' edits, this is not the same thing as the user right. If you have need for, and want to request these rights you can post requests at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer, Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/File mover. Until then you should remove the userboxes etc saying you are in those permission groups. Thanks for your understanding and enjoy your editing at Wikipedia! Cheers. Jbh ^Talk 16:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Afghanistan[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for edit warring[edit]

See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at Afghanistan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr^\ talk / 19:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Loy Afghanistan concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Loy Afghanistan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Loy Afghanistan[edit]

Hello, \\'arrior 786. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Loy Afghanistan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Ethnic groups in Afghanistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- LouisAragon (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is the third time you have removed referenced information under a false edit summary. Unless you take your concerns to the talk page over this issue, you may be reported the next time you remove referenced information. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for you \\'arrior 786 (talk) 03:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Afghan philosophers, you may be blocked from editing. Given that you still continue with 1) to edit war (without edit summary) 2) not presenting any sources to back up your pseudo-historical additions. Furthermore, you have been making similar disruptive edits way too many times on other articles. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jamāl al-Dīn al-Afghānī[edit]

Ok Kansas Bear you got me, most of your points are true that me myself didn't even thought about it. I want to ask you one question before editing, Where is Jamāl al-Dīn al-Afghānī born and to which country he belongs to? \\'arrior 786 (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the source I found on the Jamal al-Din al-Afghani talk page for where he was born. As for, "to which country he belongs to", what does that even mean? --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Peace be upon you. I note that you are protective about your land, which is a good thing. However, a review of your Talk Page shows that you have had some problems in the past. I recommend that you take the time to read, study, and fully understand the Wikipedia policies on citing WP:CITE reliable WP:RELIABLE sources that are verifiable WP:VERIFY. Make these your tools, and nobody will find fault in your work here. Regards, William Harris |talk 11:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate that. \\'arrior 786 (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Durand Line, you will find these useful tools as well: WP:CITET. All that I did was key into Google "Durand Line not recognised by the Afghanistan government", and a list of articles was returned. Books always carry more weight than online newspaper articles, especially books that have been written by an expert on the subject. Even better are books of which part is available online for anybody to read. Don't get frustrated or angry when someone undoes your edit - save your energy for the online hunt, then go back with citations and quietly state your truth. Cheers, William Harris |talk 21:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Durand Line. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Afghan philosophers[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Afghan philosophers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

Weeeeew Cleomaster44 (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Flag testing.svg[edit]

The file File:Flag testing.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused test file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Check Article[edit]

Sir I humbly request to you to please check my draft Draft:Mughal Khel I didn't wanted to write about a sub tribe but due to some reasons, especially that Mughal Khels besides Hassanzai are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in southern Pakhtunkhwa, speaking soft pashto. They live in Bannu and sufficient material can be found about them online and in books. Writing an article was necessary so that people know how yousafzai have a great tradition of migrating to places far away. 17:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)isparki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isparki (talk • contribs)