User talk:188.171.57.108

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Scythian cultures, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scythian cultures, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 16:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dead zone (ecology) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Dead zone (ecology) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3AF_eawtGE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Dead zone (ecology). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alexcalamaro (talk) 19:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a SOLUTION.

Is like a vacine to a virus, like aspirine and Headache.

WHAT ADVERTISING?

If you use it massively in Ganga River, you RESTORE it to LIFE

Only that YOU ignore it.

Move it where you want, but the solution for something as relevant as death rivers and deltas MUST be included.

--188.171.57.108 (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have open a request for a third opinion. Maybe someone can give their impartial opinion Alexcalamaro (talk) 14:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding waterway to multiple See also sections[edit]

Please stop doing this. It is inappropriate to add a general topic to articles about specific bodies of water. El_C 19:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a problem to add in "see also" the "Waterway" link in rivers and lakes that can be waterways?

Where is the problem?

They can be waterways, as many other in Europe, Asia or America. And a comprensive waterway net from lake Tanganyika, lake Mweru into the seaport Matadi

--188.171.57.108 (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can mention waterway in the body, but it is not suitable for a See also section, a section which in several instances you yourself created just for that one mention. El_C 19:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What was recommended to avoid was the Congo-Zambia Canal due to drough. --188.171.57.108 (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, --188.171.57.108 (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)but irrespective of that, that's just not how See also sections are used on Wikipedia. El_C 20:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to South Sudan, you may be blocked from editing. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 22:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kabalo. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 22:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If adding the population under 14 year old from the World Bank is "vandalizing the "demographics" part of South Sudan, you are under drugs.

--188.171.57.108 (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--188.171.57.108 (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC) I undo that you erase the commets,[reply]

tricky cheater

--188.171.57.108 (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 - killarnee -- LYER?[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at South Sudan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 22:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at South Sudan, you may be blocked from editing. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 23:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

HEY VANDALIZER:

TRACK THE DATA:

WORLD BANK for POPULATION --188.171.57.108 (talk) 23:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.