User talk:2600:1002:B100:0:0:0:0:0/42
Editing from this range has been disabled (blocked) by an administrator in response to abuse.
Editing by unregistered users from this IP address range has been blocked. In rare cases, usually in response to serious abuse, logged-in editing may also be blocked. Depending on the size of the blocked range, the block may affect anything from very small numbers to several thousands of IP addresses. If you do not believe that you are the person this block is intended for, please follow the instructions below:
If you do not have an account: If you do not currently have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. Please follow the instructions on this page to request an account under your preferred username. It may take a few days to process your request, but we will process it as quickly as possible.
If you have an account: Please log in to edit. If you still cannot edit, please place {{unblock}} on your talk page and make reference to this message; you may wish to ping the blocking administrator. You may also wish to email them via the "email this user" function.
Administrators: Please consult the blocking administrator before altering or lifting this block, and consider consulting with a CheckUser before granting an IP block exemption to an editor using this range. Note that large or hard (logged-in editing blocked) rangeblocks are usually only made in response to serious abuse, and the blocking admin may have information about this block which is essential to reviewing any unblock request.
Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Editing from this range has been disabled (blocked) in response to abuse. A range may be shared by many users and innocent users may be affected; if you believe that you are not the person this block is intended for, please follow the instructions below:
If you have an account: Please log in to edit. In rare cases, in response to serious abuse, logged-in editing may also be disabled. If you still cannot edit, place {{unblock}} on your talk page and make reference to this message. You may wish to ping the blocking administrator or email them via the "email this user" function.
If you do not have an account: Registered users are still able to edit. If you cannot create an account from this or another network, you may request that volunteers create your username for you. Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request an account under your preferred username. It may take some time to process your request.
Administrators: Please consult the blocking administrator before altering or lifting this block, and consider consulting with a CheckUser before granting an IP block exemption to an editor using this range. Note that large or hard (logged-in editing blocked) rangeblocks are usually only made in response to serious abuse, and the blocking admin may have information about this block which is essential to reviewing any unblock request. -- Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC))
2600:1002:B100:0:0:0:0:0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello! I was blocked without any explanation. The reason given was disruptive editing, but I'm not sure what it is I did that was disruptive. I was involved in a somewhat controversial discussion involving the Holocaust and the Holodomor, and what relation the latter has to the former, and I probably phrased something badly or said something unwise, or said something in a way that came off as an insult to another editor, in which case I get it, but I'd at least like to know what I did, and I can't seem to access my post log to see what the last thing I said was. If I said something that came off as calling someone a Holocaust denier then I apologize. My best guess is that it came from me trying to explain to another editor why the Holocaust was coming up in the discussion, which required explaining the rather controversial position held by the individual the article itself is about. That individual wrote a book alleging that much of the popular narrative of the Holodomor was initially spread by Ukrainian Nationalists who went on to become SS officers, and additionally alleged that the term "Holodomor" and some other aspects of the postwar narrative were, in part, a deliberate attempt by some to downplay the Holocaust by equating it with the Ukrainian famine. Essentially doing a "both sides" thing. Again, this is what the author alleged in the book that the article is about. It's not my personal position. Some of the editors in the talk page seemed to not know that this was what the book was about, and the article itself is entirely about criticism of the book, not what the book said, so I thought it necessary to explain. I suspect that I may have done a bad job, and come off as both personally advocating all of those ideas, and accusing other editors of being the bad guys from that narrative. If that's what happened here, I sincerely apologize. That's my bad. In such a sensitive discussion, I have a responsibility to be very clear in my language. Also, this IP is my local library (I happened to be here and thought it was a good opportunity to post this, I didn't come here specifically to evade the ban, I'd have just made an account for that). So please don't ban the library because of me. I'm sure others edit from this IP address. Hopefully this is formatted properly. I'm still learning how wikipedia works on a technical level. 73.33.168.206 (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
2600:1002:B100:0:0:0:0:0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hi again, I'm sorry, I'm struggling to figure out all these rules. If I post this from an account it's okay, but not from a different IP? Am I understanding that correctly? I'm not really clear on why the one is ban evasion but not the other, and the WP:EVADE seems to imply that I'm just going to get this account banned as well. But the other thing says this is okay, so. Idk. RIP. To whoever reads this, if you bother, please see the above unblock request for my reason. I don't know why I was originally banned, and was not given an explanation, but I speculate about it above. I'd appreciate it if someone could give me some clarification, even if it comes alongside banning me. I'm deeply confused, disoriented, and discouraged, lol. This place is difficult for beginners.
EDIT: oh I see, I think it's because I also tried to explain myself below the post that I think got me banned. Sorry, in retrospect that's obviously ban evasion and I shouldn't have done that. I was impatient to try to clarify myself, since clearly I was seen as having insulted someone, and it deeply bothers me that I can't apologize and clarify yet, or possibly ever. I wasn't thinking, beyond "oh I'm at the library, this is a different IP address, I can post from here and try to fix things". I actually didn't know I was banned on my cell phones IP address until about 15 minutes before I made the above unblock request. I was happily going around posting, and then had to turn off my WiFI for a second and found out I couldn't post from my personal IP.
Decline reason:
You, the person, are blocked. Not the IP. Please stop. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No. You violated WP:EVADE when you edited articles, despite being blocked. See for example, Special:Contributions/73.33.168.206. Blocks apply to the person, see WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)