User talk:ApexPreditor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Links to draft articles[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Advisory opinion. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, ApexPredator. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. This goes on your User page.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. David notMD (talk) 13:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is that Draft:Brenkwitz Farms has no potential to becoming accepted as an article, ditto any intent to create and submit drafts about Steve Brenkwitz, the Brenkwitz family or the surname Brenkwitz. David notMD (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]