User talk:Arkanis50

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Arkanis50, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Jamie Richter. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Sting_au Talk 11:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Richter[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jamie Richter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Jamie Richter. Sting_au Talk 11:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted one of those prods. My javascript is playing up tonight. I'm having difficulty establishing any notability for this Jamie Richter? See how you go with finding some third party references and then cite them on the article please. Sting_au Talk 12:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I see you removed the PROD. I still don't think he's notable enough yet i.e. how many books sold, what awards has he won for writing? Hopefully the novel coming up in 2008 will actually sell? Bet you're hoping it does too :-) Anyhow, I'm not going to tag the article with a speedy (I was thinking about it). At least the guy is having a go with his writing, and there are plenty of articles on people in Wikipedia with questionable notability. Besides that you've done a lot of work with the article and have shown you can be great benefit to Wikipedia as an editor. Have a go at fixing up some other articles. Cheers, Sting_au Talk 23:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Skive06.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Skive06.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Skive06.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Skive06.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Modgraphic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Modgraphic.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 09:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]