User talk:Atheismrocks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Atheismrocks! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atheismrocks (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Did anyone read the Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy section in "what wikipedia is not", it said "If the rules prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, you should ignore them. Disagreements should be resolved through consensus-based discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures." I have provided information which otherwise wouldn't have been, I even gave an explination for why I keep putting Petrol first in the Gasoline article, I feel that I can improve the encyclopedia so I can ignore the rules (at present, sock-puppettry). I haven't done anything destructive toward anyone on this account, why block it? Have you read the section on the song 'Baby got Back'? The edit about the song 'Baby got Jack' was me (under another account) not only did I help out wikipedia, I helped out someone who was in distress over this not being made public. I have been able to improve the encyclopedia therefore, according to wikipedia guidelines, I can ignore certain rules restricting me from editing. May I also have a proper discussion with a few editors, I'm allowed that according to the guidelines, but I haven't received even upon asking (this unblock request doesn't count), I'm after something where we can have a constructive debate, Thanks

Decline reason:

Gaming the system doesn't score you any points in my mind. I have no intention of releasing you from a block in which you, quite stridently, admit to breaking the rules. The block will stand. — Trusilver 01:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock declined[edit]

A banned user is a banned user. You cannot create a new account, use the userpage to soapbox, and then pretend to be making a fresh start. Please stop using this page to soapbox, or someone will wind up protecting it. Dlohcierekim 01:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]