User talk:Atxav8r

October 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Death panel does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Atxav8r, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content about living people and editwarring[edit]

Content about living people MUST be appropriately sourced and presented. Your cherry picking and POV presentation of content at Stephanie Cutter is not appropriate. And edit warring to continually re-insert it is absolutely not acceptable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rick Perry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dreadstar ☥ 20:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm MrX. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Texans for Public Justice seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 01:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]