User talk:BRLibertarian

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BRLibertarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Gaismagorm (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BRLibertarian (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you recently removed content from TeX without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Remsense诉 17:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've reverted a few other of your recent edits on the basis that WP:Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, or generally a place where one is linked to software utilities related to a topic—generally, ask yourself if Britannica would link to a relevant github repo, even if it is useful. Cheers! Remsense诉 17:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Remsense, I explained in the summary, but I can explain to you:

I couldn't find the mime Type described in the box "application/x-tex" in the IANA media type list, as my understanding they are responsible for defining this types.

Initial release info is redundant.

File extension I do not think it is critical, even on the project website they say that "You can, of course, “just read it”, since it’s a plain text file; the problem is that the markup tags in the document may prove distracting. Most of the time, even TeX experts will typeset a (La)TeX file before attempting to read it. [...] Are you “put off” by all this? — remember that TeX is good at producing PDF: why not ask the person who sent the TeX file to send an PDF copy?"

Type format: sure, it is a text file, but can you read it? It's more like html, markup.

The LaTex article, software based in TeX, doesn't have this info box. I think it is more suitable because it is just a typesetting software.

By the way, I've updated the Stable release version in the article, if you don't mind.

P.S.: The DeGoogle github is a project related to the "DeGoogle Movement", it shows that it exist, the same as the "De-Google-ify project" but in another format. I think Wikipedia is more dynamic than Britannica, and that is why it exists. Search about DeGoogle in Britannica. Nothing right? No problem about the reversion on the other page, unary operation, agreed.

Bst rgds! BRLibertarian (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but if we're discussing TeX encyclopedically, it's important to acknowledge the .tex format, I would argue, though it's certainly a bit low level these days as you describe. In any case, I think each of your inclusions could have merit, but I think discussion on the respective talk pages could establish a firmer consensus. Remsense诉 00:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]