User talk:Baloghadamsoftware

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Baloghadamsoftware, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 12:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Air France–KLM shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued edit warring is not helpful. You have already been reverted by two editors and an admin. You are heading for a block if you don't stop and discuss instead. - Ahunt (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I just restored the original content that was deleted without discussion. The content was there for 5.5 years. To delete such old content a discussion should be started first. Baloghadamsoftware (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was clear from the number of editors that were involved that the removal was supported which is probably why nobody started a discussion, that said you were clearly edit warring and the number of reverts you made did break the rules which could get you blocked, being right or wrong is not an excuse to breech the three-revert rule, please take care. MilborneOne (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]