User talk:Beanatascha

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Beanatascha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Beatrice Rosen have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GcSwRhIc (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Beatrice Rosen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 15:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Beatrice Rosen, you may be blocked from editing. Do not not change again without discussing on the Talk page. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beatrice Rosen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 04:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Beatrice Rosen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This has been gone over with you before. You need to provide a reliable source for the date of birth change. Do not change again until that reliable source is cited. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 11:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrice Rosen[edit]

If you are in fact Beatrice Rosen, then please see WP:BIOSELF. IMDb is not a reliable source but it the only source, Since you started these edit changes, you have failed to cite a single verifiable source for your edits. You have not discussed the edits on the talk page though you have been told not change without discussion. I am willing not to revert it again if you cite at least one verifiable source. It should be simple enough to change the bio on the official web site to show the correct year of birth, if in fact 1984 is correct. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 03:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Beanatascha. You have new messages at Beeblebrox's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Great! Done. Thanks.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Blocked[edit]

Since we have no way to verify that you are, in fact, Beatrice Rosen, I have blocked your account; to be unblocked, you need to e-mail WP:OTRS and confirm your identity. Once that's done, you can be unblocked and we can sort out the issue of your birthday. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How do I email you to prove it? BR