User talk:BeyRel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello BeyRel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 05:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

IP vandalism[edit]

Thanks for alerting me to the IP's behavior. I see he is making pesky unsourced changes to statistics. I will take care of it.

By the way, the best thing to do in this situation is to use an appropriate user warning template from WP:UTM, and if the vandalism does not stop, report the vandal at WP:AIV. - Gilliam 05:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to hear your opinions![edit]

Dear BeyRel! Nice to meet you!

I know that you are also a Chinese and I think you know exact about the Chinese culture as well. In last days, in Religion in China has had controversies between me and Saimdusan (strong anti-Buddhism and Chinese religions). Please give us your opinions and let people know more about the truth of Asian culture. It's really needed!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Religion_in_China#The_heavy_influence_of_Buddhism_-_Chinese_religions_among_various_East_Asian_civilizations

Please help me, brother! Thank you so much!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-Indian war[edit]

I noticed you reverted my edit. I thought I'd let you know that Neville Maxwell is not a neutral source and I would go so far as to say he isn't even a credible one since the majority of his predictions didn't come true. It is also well established he has a strong anti-India attitude (just do some basic research). In the meanwhile I am letting the edit stay but this is for future reference. Vedant (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vedant, I traced your talk page to here and I would like to comment on this. If your standpoint is not neutral, you can hardly critisize others being bias. Neville Maxwell spent more time investigating this war than anyone I know. Let's respect his work. I would recommend you read his book and Calvin's first, then make your comments. Xingdong (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't deny having a certain bias, and I don't think you can either Xingdong considering your past edits on the matter. In fact I accept that at times I am biased to the Indian POV. However, the only citation I have challenged was Neville Maxwell's quotation citing Maxwell's controversial views on India. As I said, in the meanwhile I am open to keeping the citation as is.Vedant (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]