User talk:BirgittaMTh

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BirgittaMTh. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By His Bootstraps[edit]

Hi Birgitta! I saw your comment on By his bootstraps talk page. You seem like a very smart and erudite person. Could I recruit your unpaid labor to edit the article some more, including the plot description(about Genevieve and also about Bob's music purchases, and whether Bob was a version of (Bob)Heinlein himself(Bob does say I'm from Missouri at one point)), and especially any insights you have? Thanks for your time and best wishes! Rich (talk) 20:59, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What you ask sounds like original research, what is frowned upon in wikipedia…? Thank you for calling me smart and erudite, though :) BirgittaMTh (talk) 10:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Master and Margarita[edit]

I found some usable references for this article. A reference cited systud.msk.su. This may be "Research Institute for System Studies [Information Technologies], Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia" and ru:Научно-исследовательский институт системных исследований РАН. Victor Anatolyevich Vassiliev has a redlink: Research Institute for System Studies that does not seem to be cited on ru:Васильев, Виктор Анатольевич. As I cannot understand Russian, would you make a translated stub for Research Institute for System Studies ? Thank you. 2601:646:200:120:C0B3:FD0E:F5C8:B992 (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alerts and notifications turned off and I cannot turn them on[edit]

Last notifications I got 27 July, I guess, and after that this bell and and box – alerts and notifications – remain grey and show no numbers or anything, even though my watch list seems to be in order, proper filters, checkmark in checkbox 'web', as war as I understand (admittedly, not much…) technicalities. What to do, if i want notifications, as they used to be – every time coming back I saw what changes had been made, since I opened wikipedia and sisters last time. BirgittaMTh (talk) 09:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think I'm not the only one who doesn't understand your question, or what kind of answer the candidates should give. I think all these candidates are aware that English is a world language, yes. Drmies (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I hope :) (But was not totally sure, after reading some candidates' userpages.) Just that I've seen plenty of articles on worldwide things, written from pretty narrow POV of USA (or at best including countries where English is one of official languages). And it is good to remind arbiter-electing-community, and arbiters, that while this is not essentially wrong, as English Wikipedia is for americans, too, but that this POV might be challenged, and I think this is where possibility appears that arbiter might have to say something. (Sometimes I have strong feeling that mention of USA does not belong in preambul of article, when subject is worldwide. But if I deleted this part, I'm afraid it might start edit war or smth.) Also, when importance and relevance of article might be challenged, not sure, if this is possible, but, say, there is a person, just barely important enough for e.g. Estonian and Latvian historians, to deserve wikip article, our only common language is English. But person is not important for official English-speaking world. I hope I am seeing ghosts here, and actual English Wikipedia policy is to encourage to write articles in English about small-language-cultures, so's to spread knowledge in wide world. :) All this seemed too much to put into question for potential arbiters, so it was kind of implied in simple question what can be answered with simple yes. Or elaborate, if they feel like that. BirgittaMTh (talk) 08:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]