User talk:Bluesargam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia communication[edit]

You did it right. Most Wikipedians communicate by leaving messages on one another's talk page. I suppose you want to discuss the Indian Online Classifieds article. I removed the reviews and links per the policy mentioned above. If any of those companies satisfy the requirements of WP:CORP, then creating an article and adding an internal link would be appropriate. I'll leave a message for a knowledgeable contributor to the India article to see what he thinks. Regards, OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a question at the bottom of the talk page for India. I'd like to get feedback from editors who are more knowledgeable about India. We should continue the discussion on the talk page for the classifieds article; I'll move this discussion there. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, let's give it a day or so and see if we can get some other opinions. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the content back so that people can review it properly. I will look forward to hearing their comments. bluesargamTalk 23:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bechna.com[edit]

You are welcome to comment at the deletion discussion, but I'm going to leave it up there to see what the consensus is. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Online Classifieds Industry[edit]

Hello! Got your message at my talk page. I am from Kochi. Great to meet you too. :) I proposed to have the article deleted, because you have only encyclopedia articles on wikipedia. You could have (and should have) added each of those websites separately as an article, and then added a category called "Indian Online Classifieds Industry". Then on the "Indian Online Classifieds Industry" page, you should have just put in the general details. But don't lose heart. I lost count of how many of MY articles have been deleted. I used to hate wikipedia for that reason. Everybody just used to revert whatever I created. But then later on I realised there was some logic to all their claims. So cheer up, and keep contributing! :) thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK

Bechna.com[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bechna.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 21:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bechna logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bechna logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)