User talk:PeteMonacelli

Welcome!

Hello, PeteMonacelli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Aurora Street[edit]

You wrote this article, which is very short and does not make a clear claim of why the street is notable. Can you expand it more, explaining the significance of the street? Otherwise the article may be deleted. Rigadoun (talk) 05:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed New York State Route 96B contains the information you added about Aurora Street, could it just be redirected to that article? If you need help making a redirect, just ask me or for help from anyone using {{helpme}}. On the other hand, if there is a lot to say about the renovation project linked to in your article, maybe it could turn into a reasonable article. Rigadoun (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been to breakfast on Aurora Street, and I'm afraid I really don't think it is notable. I have redirected it to 96B. cOrneLlrOckEy 14:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the resistance to allowing Aurora Street to have a page. It does not carry much weight and significance outside the Ithaca area, as opposed to, for example, a street like Yonge Street in Toronto. However, for Ithacans, it is an important street containing many downtown restaurants, a local furniture store, and a connection to Fall Creek in the north and Ithaca College in the south. I dismiss the trite remark by user cornellrockey - opinions are opinions - the fact that you "don't think it is notable" is not sufficient reason to reject the page. I propose two solutions: 1. We could add the content of the Aurora Street page to the Ithaca, New York page, or 2. We could let the Aurora Street page remain but rename it to be more specific, such as "Aurora Street, Ithaca NY". Cayuga (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please demonstrate its notability as described here: WP:NOTABILITY cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 14:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ComponentOne[edit]

I have restored its cleanup tags since these concerns have not been addressed. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ComponentOne[edit]

I am not trying to delete it, I have just merely placed cleanup tags on it so that the article deficiencies might be corrected. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gimme Coffee[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gimme Coffee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

fails WP:CORP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Josh Parris 12:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McTavish Street[edit]

I have this photo in 1024x768 resolution, I think. Do you need it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argrig (talk • contribs) 00:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Internet Explorer 11 page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]